“Homo socialis”: without restrictions

Curator: Maria Garganté Llanes

Number of works: 55

Museums represented: MACBA, MNAC, Museu d’Art de Cerdanyola, Museu Víctor Balaguer, Museus de Sitges, Museu d’Art de Girona, Museu del Disseny, Fundació Palau, Museu de l’Empordà, Museu de la Garrotxa, Museu d’Art Modern de Tarragona, Museu de Reus, Museu de Valls, Museu Frederic Marès, MORERA. Museu d’Art Modern i Contemporani de Lleida, Museu Diocesà i Comarcal de Solsona, Museu Apel·les Fenosa, Museu d’Art de Sabadell, Museu Abelló, Museu de Lleida, MEV Museu d’Art Medieval, Museu de Manresa.

Introduction

The objective of this exhibition is to undertake an exercise in “looking” from our post-pandemic present, based on works from a pre-pandemic past. To see how an image as iconic and integrated into our imagination, such as a Last Supper at a Gothic table, for a year and a half became an unimaginable type of meeting or at least one that was frowned on for health and social reasons. Thus, the exhibition will not be based on a mere collection of works of art about parties, social life in bars or dining, but on the fact that all these activities were eliminated from our lives for a quite a long period in our recent history.

Therefore, we begin with the “shock” of being deprived of this type of interaction and also the difficulty of “relating” again. Does the anxiety to make up for lost time coexist with a certain bitter awareness that something has been broken forever? These are some of the questions that underly our look at art through the works we have chosen.

Thinkers such as Georges Bataille or Émile Durkheim defined an eminently social expression like the party as an institution that challenges the anthropological model of homo economicus, given that it pursues only individual interest, whereas a certain a social solidarity derives from every collective celebration. Thus, homo festus (the collective expression of homo ludens) would also be homo socialis.

Ultimately, human interaction always determines the construction of a social reality. That is why our main objective will be for the exhibition itinerary to evoke what the pandemic deprived us of for almost two years and, at the same time, to symbolise the “recovery”, this time without restrictions.

Festive celebrations of a religious nature:
from Corpus Christi to the Festa Major.

Religious festivals have traditionally had a public dimension, expressed in aspects such as processions that, in the case of Corpus Christi or Holy Week , become the central event. The procession had to be a reflection of the maintenance of social order, so it was about involving all the locality’s important social agents in order to create their best “showcase”.

The configuration of these urban retinues corresponds to a model of celebration that regulates and structures the festival: the space is defined by an itinerary along which the festive characters move. It is worth noting that the Church increasingly distanced itself from the presence of the festive entourage in religious processions, so that in the 19th century a separation occurred. This means that today, elements such as giants or mythical bestiary are associated with a more secular concept of Festa Major (patron saint’s day festival). Nevertheless, the most recent recovery of historic festive processions reintegrates them into their original function.

Carnival: between Tradition and Transgression.

Carnival or Carnestoltes (“meat off”, if we adapt it from carne levare remove meat from the Latin or carnes tollendas, which would have the same meaning), has always been associated with an extreme vitalist sense of “taking advantage”, with the praxis of excess and transgression of the days before the beginning of Lent. The ancestral opportunity to subvert the established order, to “disguise” in the original sense of misleading or leaving no trace; being able to be someone else, being able to turn fate and the world upside down for an instant.

The 2020 Carnival took place very shortly before  our world was “shut down”, although Italy, which was the first European country to suffer the ravages of the virus, had already suspended the Venice Carnival that same year, when the country’s northern regions were the most affected. Rio de Janeiro suspended the 2021 carnival, especially the street celebrations, and the Venetian carnival was “streamed”. In our country, the most emblematic carnivals were also affected. Vilanova’s was experienced through social media and the Canal Blau, although the street decoration was not renounced. In Sitges, the processions were cancelled and exhibitions and street decorations were promoted. These were atypical carnivals full of longing for those who experience them intensively every year.

 

The Joy of Sharing a Table

One of the aspects most affected by the pandemic was the collective meals or get-togethers that involved gathering round a table to share a meal. Such social gatherings had to be reduced to the so-called “bubbles”, which were limited to your closest family or the people with whom you had the closest contact. They could not contain more than six people, except for festive Christmas meals, when ten diners were allowed, although from a maximum of two family bubbles. This led to the cancellation of many Christmas lunches and dinners and consequently there were no passionate family discussions or meals with friends and colleagues for the major holidays. From time to time in the media we read of an occasional transgression of the rules by a clandestine group meal that immediately resulted into a rise in contagion or an increase in admissions to the intensive care wards. Restaurants were closed: initially throughout the day and then at night, when sharing a table normally lasts until the wee hours and we already know the dangers that night-time has always brought in the imaginary of law and order.

For pleasure. Let’s meet in the open air

When the lockdown measures began to be relaxed, coinciding with the arrival of summer, outdoor gatherings became the most sought-after expression of freedom. In some towns, the opening of swimming pools was postponed and access to beaches was restricted to avoid overcrowding. Social distancing and control measures were imposed and drones were used to ensure they were respected. Young people in particular began to seek alternative spaces to escape this strict control that they perceived as arbitrary. They began to discover waterfalls, streams and ponds where they could meet and cool off. There was a kind of “rediscovery” of the surroundings for recreational purposes, from picnics to nocturnal botellones (outdoor drinking parties), with a single goal: a feeling of freedom.

The selected pictures capture the spirit of enjoying the outdoors, along the lines explained by A. De Saint-Éxupery in Letter to a Hostage (1948): “It was a good sun. Its warmth bathed the poplars on the other bank and the plain, all the way to the horizon. We felt increasing happiness, without knowing why. (…) We were totally at peace, immersed, far from the disorder, in a definitive civilisation.”

Social leisure. Bars and shows

Bars, the focal point of an important part of social leisure, were among the most missed establishments during the strict lockdown and those on which the focus was placed once the restrictions began to be lifted. Use of the terraces was restricted (no group or table could exceed six people) and night-time opening was not allowed. In short, we experienced the alteration of what some urban planners and sociologists call the “Third Space”, that of socialisation.

On the other hand, “Culture is Safe” was the slogan most repeated by professionals and businesspeople linked to the performing arts. Despite it having been shown that going to the theatre was not a source of contagion the capacity limitations, social distancing and hygiene measures were scrupulously observed in most cases it was a sector severely punished by prolonged closures. Why were the scapegoats those spaces where people tend to be happy?

Public Privacy. Rites of Society

Among the social rituals most affected by the pandemic were weddings, which are still one of the quintessential family events that involve showing off in society, not only to the extended family, but also to friends. The wedding, moreover, consists of different parts, all of which were prohibited during the strictest moments of lockdown: the ceremony (civil or religious), the banquet and the dance. Some media spoke of the “emotional loss” for the couples forced to postpone what advertising still wishes to define as “one of the happiest days” of their lives.

Other social rituals par excellence that were truncated include the celebration of births and funeral ceremonies. With the former, newborns could not be visited to share the joyous moment. In the case of the latter, the pain of a solitary death in a hospital or care home was compounded by the impossibility of family and friends to come together to express their grief.

Shall we dance?

The dance can be ritual in the context of a certain tradition. It involves an audience that applauds and endorses it, or it may be merely for fun, without ignoring the fact that a big festa major marquee dance or disco is also ruled by rituality, ranging from exhibition to courtship. The proximity and contact provided by dance was outlawed during the pandemic, when a necessary “social distance” was advocated. Sardanes were allowed if the dancers held a handkerchief or piece of cloth by two ends, so as to avoid hand contact. On the other hand, the festa major dances were suppressed and often reduced to outdoor concerts, which had to be witnessed sitting in well-spaced chairs, while the body was deprived of the expression of movement that follows the rhythm of the music.

Taking the street (I). Leisure and business.

The street was forbidden territory during lockdown. We could view it from our balconies. Its casual occupation whether by children playing or people walking was banned and unauthorised use was often denounced by one’s own neighbours. It was not a pleasant situation and fluctuated between imponderables such as fear, obedience and the uncertainty of it all. Some measures that regulated access to the public highway were very controversial, such as the permissiveness regarding walking dogs versus the ban on going out with children. Leaving the house to put the rubbish out became one of the most coveted activities in the daily routine and one of the rare moments in which to recall the taste of freedom.

However, the street is not only a place for leisure, but also a place in which to do business. This was affected by the ban on street markets and fairs that lasted for many months.

Taking the street (II). The streets will always be ours?

During lockdown we were able to see how health-related fear emptied the streets, not only because it was forbidden to use them idly but because any demonstration or action of mass protest was also unfeasible. Breaking the rules often meant being reprimanded by one’s own neighbours and we began to speak, informally, of the “balcony police”. In this respect, little by little the occupation of the street through the terraces of the hospitality industry was progressively allowed. Even before that, time slots were established for going out for a walk. However, manifestations of a festive and reclamatory nature retinues, parades, etc.took the longest to be re-permitted and it was not until 2022 that it was possible to convene them again normally. But what has been the underlying effect of almost two years of paralysation?

Other meeting places

In the harshest moments of lockdown, the only meeting spaces beyond the home were virtual. We connected via Zoom, Meet, Teams, etc., the 21st-century agoras in which we could come together, converse and debate. We also “learned” to work “online” from the solitude of our own homes. In this section we show some meeting places that were forbidden to us: coexistence in a work or teaching environment; the backrooms of shops as gathering spaces; or the laundries of years gone by as places of female confidence and conviviality.

Finally, “visiting” someone during the pandemic also became a utopia and prudence or fear made a big hole in people’s social habits for a long time.